Thursday, March 29, 2012

Project Direction

I would like to look more deeply into reviews of Whitman's work in order to gain a more complete understanding of the literary time period in which he was writing. I am interested primarily in his negative reviews- I would like to examine (and then compare and contrast) the work of Whitman's "traditional" contemporaries, as well as the canonical authors mentioned by the reviewers, with Song of Myself in an attempt to understand what aspects of Whitman's work proved so offensive to his negative reviewers. I intend to explore common themes the reviewers focused on (rough language, "inappropriate" subject matter, etc) and what they tell us about literature before and after Whitman's writing. My question is essentially: What aspects of Whitman's work proved most offensive to his negative reviewers, how do those aspects differ poetically from what had come before, how does the existence of these particular objections characterize the literary society in which Whitman was writing, and ultimately how does Whitman change this characterization with his poems?

5 comments:

  1. Hey sounds like you'll have a lot on your plate to tackle but good questions can lead to promising answers. I'm guessing you're going to rely mostly on interpretation and analyzing the reviews to gather information. Have you decided on a medium for your project?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm considering doing a side by side comparison of Song of Myself with one of Whitman's contemporaries and then using that to discern what is truly "Whitmanian" about Walt's work. I think that the two poems (which will serve as examples for each side of the reviewers arguments) will give me something tangible about the time period to go off of as I explore Whitman's reviews further. I can then attempt to discover what was considered "real poetry" at the time, and what about Whitman's work was so incendiary and how the two works characterize and change that definition respectively.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This project does indeed seem like a lot to handle, but it will surely provide you with bountiful knowledge on two different subjects (being what makes Whitman "Whitman" and what the actual norm for poetry was back then). When you say "side by side comparison", I imagine a literal side-by-side chart, with "Whitman" on one side, and "Acceptable Normal Contemporary" on the other, listing their differences. You could even do a Venn Diagram if you find any notable similarities between the two!

    ReplyDelete
  4. OKay . . sounds like a good avenue . . . start small and focused and then work outward . . I suspect that your list of questions may require a much wider/greater time/labor scope . . .

    ReplyDelete
  5. I could most certainly narrow it down and either choose a side-by-side comparison, OR focus on the reviewers.

    ReplyDelete